softballlover123

Status:
Joined: June 12, 2011
Last Seen: 1 decade
user id: 182154
Location: In a white van.
Lol. Who actually reads these things?

Quote Comments by softballlover123

softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6710481
show buttons

Shane Dawson, Jenna Marbles, Nigahiga, LewisParker, swoozie, PewDiePie, storpey, Tyler Oakley, lol and about 20 more unknown ones :)
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6708905
show buttons

softballlover123 :)
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Religious freedom, to believe in whatever religion, but the primary religion was Christianity, and MOST OF THE MORALS FROM A CHRISTIAN CHURCH (as i said) were steps for writing out the constitution
reply 0
josiewdog123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Not at all, the Constitution writers did not base the document from Christian morals. John Locke was where Hamilton and others got their influence from, and some of the English constitution. Christianity was not added into the Constitution due to the First Amendment
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

lol when did i mention the bible...? But nowadays it's very hard to seperate church and state no matter how hard you try. But most of the morals from when the constitutiton was founded was off a Christianized beliefs. As it was created "we the people, for the people," meaning most of their beliefs and morals were from the people which most of the population at the time were some form of Christianity
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

The bible has all the "morals" of Christianity. It's not difficult to separate church and state. It was not Christian beliefs and morals that the constitution was based off of, it was basically a document stating everything that they wanted in their government. We the people for the people was saying that they wanted the people to control the government. The first amendment of the constitution says freedom of religion, separation of church and state. The point is, human morals do not come from Christianity.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

To be honest, i don't really care. It's not really any of my business or fights. Anybody can write out rights for gays, just not many congressmen would be willing to take it up to D.C. Also, just like the rights for blacks, it tooks hundreds of years before anything was officially done. It might take a while for the rights for gays to happen.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, the ban of gay marriage is currently being looked over by the Supreme Court
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

i understand. i just don't think we should have a repeat of history. this should be handled completely differently than people going bizerk.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Oh yeah i know that, but when people use that as their arguement, it just makes me laugh so much, because its probably the one thing that wont get you anything if you said that
reply 0
Eli22b 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

But now a-days it will. There is seperation of church and state. The US is now a melting pot, as much as some people want to, we can't base our laws off of church morals anymore. It just won't work.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Ask Abraham Lincoln. He's the one who wrote out the legal rights for blacks
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

so why can't anyone write out rights for gays? And i was looking at your quotes, and are you for or against gay marriage?
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

To be honest, i don't really care. It's not really any of my business or fights. Anybody can write out rights for gays, just not many congressmen would be willing to take it up to D.C. Also, just like the rights for blacks, it tooks hundreds of years before anything was officially done. It might take a while for the rights for gays to happen.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, the ban of gay marriage is currently being looked over by the Supreme Court
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

i understand. i just don't think we should have a repeat of history. this should be handled completely differently than people going bizerk.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

I just want to cry with laughter whenever people say seperation of church and state... Lol the U.S was built upon the dang church's morals!
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Just because people have morals, doesn't mean it's from the bible. Seperation of church and state is the very first amendment, Freedom of Religion. Most of the founding fathers were atheist, actually. Morals don't come from the bible, -__-
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

lol when did i mention the bible...? But nowadays it's very hard to seperate church and state no matter how hard you try. But most of the morals from when the constitutiton was founded was off a Christianized beliefs. As it was created "we the people, for the people," meaning most of their beliefs and morals were from the people which most of the population at the time were some form of Christianity
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

The bible has all the "morals" of Christianity. It's not difficult to separate church and state. It was not Christian beliefs and morals that the constitution was based off of, it was basically a document stating everything that they wanted in their government. We the people for the people was saying that they wanted the people to control the government. The first amendment of the constitution says freedom of religion, separation of church and state. The point is, human morals do not come from Christianity.
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Do some research on books before the 1900s and you'll see exactly what I mean. Most if not all the founding fathers, have letters/docs that give the glory to God for uniting this country together.
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, only about three of the people who signed the Declaration of Independence didn't go to church or weren't member of a chuch. Thomas Jefferson actually had church in capitol buildings along with other founders and even some of the military for the wosrhip team.
Most of the founding fathers were theologians, and Christians. Get it right. And people who haven't read the bible tend to have lower standards than Christians, as well as morals.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

I was misinformed of their religion when I made the comment. Actually, most of the people who signs th constitution were deists. In my opinion, it doesn't even matter what religion the signers of the constitution had. Bottom line, they made the very first amendment of the constitution of freedom of religion, separation of church and state. And as or your last statement, that is absolutely (excuse the language) bullsh*t. Morals and standards do not, I repeat, not come from th bible or Christianity, and quite frankly it's insulting that you think people who don't have that religion have lower standards. I've read passages in the bible, and even if I did believe god exists, I wouldn't want to be apart of most of it. The bible states that women are lower than their husbands, and states that you shouldn't love your life or anyone in it. How, before you call my statement bullsh*t, read this. New International Version (©2011)
"Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord."
GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
"Wives, place yourselves under your husbands' authority as you have placed yourselves under the Lord's authority." 1 Corinthians 14:34 "Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says."
New International Version (©2011)
"If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters--yes, even their own life--such a person cannot be my disciple."
John 12:25 "Anyone who loves their life will lose it, while anyone who hates their life in this world will keep it for eternal life."
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

And since Paul wrote that, I wouldn't take anyone's word other than God's and basically, they're just men. I don't agree with most of the things in the bible. After all, it was comprised, and put together by men.
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

First off, Paul wrote that women should be silent. He is also the person who promoted women in church, so I wouldn't go by a lot fo what he says. The Bible (I believe, I can't remember the scripture) also says for husbands to respect their wives, which could be taken the same way, as husbands are submitting themselves to their wives.
Well, honestly, where does hating get you? Even if you don't agree with most of the bible, I think we all can agree hating is wrong.
http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html
Do some research, ok.
I said a lot of people seem to have lower standards and morals, not all. That's what I've noticed in life. You may not see it the same way I do.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

I do research, and this is the definition of deism.
"de·ism
/ˈdē-izəm/
Noun
Belief in the existence of a supreme being, specifically of a creator who does not intervene in the universe." It doesn't even ,after what religion the signers had, they all agreed they could close to have or not have a religion.
Lastly, the morals. You stated "And people who haven't read the bible tend to have lower standards than Christians, as well as morals" which is completely false. People who have read the bible or are Christians do not have higher standards than those who do not, and there are no such reliable statistics to prove it. Stating that most people who are not Christians have lower standards is completely theocentric.
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Which, obviously, they did believe God was working, because several of them were quoed, saying something like, "Without God such-and-such would not have happened."
I don't believe it is false. That's just what I believe. It's what I've seen. People who do serve God have higher morals than normal people. It may or may not be because of the Bible, but I know from experience, there's been a big impact on me from reading it. And in other people as well. Maybe I'm wrong. If I am, may God correct me.
I'm saying, that people who read the bible tend to have higher standards, NOT christians.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

I understand that it's possible they beloved in god, but it doesn't change the fact that they agreed to keep the church separate from government and give th people thir own individual choice in what hey believe in.
As for the morals, what do you have to back up the information? Just because it is your own personal experience, doesn't mean it's the majority. I have met my fair share of nasty people who believe in the bible, and I've met my air share of people who do not. What actual proof do you have that people who have read the bible will most likely have higher morals or standards?
I understand that you wish guidance from your god to see what is correct, but some things you need to just decide for yourself. There have been numerous fights and battles caused by religion, and yes also ones that involve the bible. http://www.gotquestions.org/religion-war.html and also, you actually did say Christians. "and Christians. Get it right. And people who haven't read the bible tend to have lower standards than Christians, as well as morals." See?
I'm not trying to bash your religion, I'm just trying to show you that it's not entirely logical to assume that people who have read the bible, or Christians, have higher morals or standards than those who have not, or have a different religion. Morals and standards have naturally structured over time in multiple societies around the world, just from evolution. This link has some good points, but I must warn you that the way he presents them is a little offensive. Just a heads up on that. I dont agree with the entire way he presents his logic, but its still there http://www.atheistapologist.com/2010/08/do-human-morals-come-from-religion.html
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Alright, I'll do us both a favor.
I realized, do to a comment from another viewer, that just because someone is religious, that doesn't mean that they will have higher morals. (Take radical islami extremists who sodomized and killed an ambassador, kill homosexuals, etc.) So, I get your point. I think it depends on who is reading the Bible and how they take it. As we can see in the news, some people who claim to be Christians murder people and little kids, etc. But I do believe the bible has a big impact on a person who takes words seriously. There's a lot to learn in the book and if you take it with a grain of salt (since a lot of what Paul says is bound to the Law of Moses, which was broken when Jesus rose) and other people who somehow got their works bound into the Bible.

And honestly, I appreciate having a decent conversation with someone who's not bashing my beliefs and acting like all christians are horrible. It's rare.

It's fine. Haha. I'm typing on the phone as well and my thumbs are starting to get sore!
I'm sorry for being insistent on any flawed opinions of mine, because I realized, I was wrong in some of it.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

No worries, you're actually really nice to have a conversation with. Many of the people on here have resorted to nasty words instead of actual arguments, and it's quite sad. I completely understand, religion does have a huge impact on someone's life and I do believe that it's a large part of some people, and that's not always a bad thing. I have many friends with different religions, and they're all extremely nice and well rounded.
It's so difficult to type without an actual keyboard ahah. I re-read my comment and cringed at some of my spelling mistakes and grammar.
I mixed up some of my argument at the beginning too. For example: with the religion of signers. No worries. I'm always changing my views as I continue through out life and everything.(:
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Ah, well, good. I don't feel too nice sometimes and honestly want to say, "Screw you," and walk away. But being ignorant gets you nowhere and I can't stay mad for long so what's the point.
I know. If they can't express their opinion without cussing or name-calling, then they kind of need to grow up. That's childish, actually. Throwing a temper tantrum just because someone doesn't agree with you. Yeah, it'll happen. Whatdya expect?
Yes, it's amazing. Haha.
Yeah, me too. I'm friends with Muslims and Catholics and others... they're nice and aren't morons running around with buckets of "I'm always correct" pills. *rolls eyes* thank the Lord.

Yeah, it is. Although, it works pretty well on my iPad, I don't like typing onscreen with phones and such. I have to take ten seconds to carefully press one letter before I'm all, "Forget it."
Ahh, I know, but you can't scroll up the message or you'll lose you're place and asdfghjkl. I hate that. You kind of have to say, "Whatever, if someone starts pulling that bull about grammar, I'm going to tell them I tried."
Ok. Haha. Most of us do and it's a good thing, usually. Change can be good. Anyways, thanks for the convo and have a good day.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Haha, yes sometimes I have the urge to just type "Screw you" and be done with everything, but then I think of the outcome. It just causes more people to spaz and it starts even more of a riot. Exactly! Honestly, usually people who are commenting with strong opinions, but resort to just cussing and spitting names are the people who will never change their mind, no matter what you say. And yes, the world is full of diverse people and that's never going to change. People can discuss differences, but they need to learn to discuss civilly, otherwise they look childish. haha, oh my gosh that made me laugh. "Buckets of 'i'm always correct' pills'" haha. I know one too many people in this world that walk around with those and over dose daily.
hahah, i know right? I personally hate typing on Ipads, because I always misplace my fingers and turn one world into an entirely different world, and then it just looks even worse.
Thanks for the convo, and you too(:
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Haha, I was going to say that and I totally get it. Some people just push way too many buttons that you didn't even know you had. Sigh.
And the people who do resort to calling names and such, act like the people who disagree with them, usually. Like, oh, yeah, because cussing me out will definitely change my opinion. Like, what, how about NO.

They look extremely childish doing so. It makes me just stare at the screen and laugh.
Thanks, it made me laugh too. Haha. :D

Yes, it's kind of sad. They don't realize that anger rarely changes things for the better and that nobody likes to listen to a raving lunatic unless they are raving lunatic as well.

Mm, I know, sometimes I'm just typing all kinds of words that I've never even heard of. I write stories so I guess I'm better at the whole touchscreen idea. Autocorrect accidentally got my friend the other day with "hicky" while she was talking to her friend and she said things got awkward real quick. Haha. Whoops. Oh well.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Haha, if anything it makes me stick with my opinion even more when people start cussing names. It's like "oh yeah, I would soooo join you on your side of the argument now." Lol.
It's insanely childish.
Even if they are both raving lunatics, there won't be much of a compromise.
Oh gosh, that would be soooo awkward! haha
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Well, really! I mean, come on. I do not think the cuss words were created first so we shouldn't need them to express our opinions.
Yeah.
Haha, I was like, "Well, what can you do?" You can turn autocorrect off but then you type like a five year old. Love-hate relationship, I guess. Just have to read everything twice before sending! Haha. I hope I don't ever have autocorrect make me send something I would never ever say. That would be so embarrassing and I couldn't type fast enough to apologize and say it wasn't my fault!!
Alright, I'm going to do some schoolwork and stop playing around on witty. And you don't have to reply to this if you don't want to, since we're bsically commenting (ahh, basically, whatever) on someone else's quote and have to scroll for ages to see the comments.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Oh gosh, our convo is long, Sorry about that ahah. I'll stop commenting now(:
reply 0
sugrfree 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

It's fine. I'm used to it. :)
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Excuse the typos... I'm typing on a touch screen and I'm currently finding it quite difficult.
reply 0
josiewdog123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Wrong. The initial purpose to go to the new world was religious freedom, but the Constitution is not built off of the church. Hael, most of our Founding Fathers were atheists, but you know, no one cares about that. Read the Treaty of Tripoli by Jefferson in 1796.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Religious freedom, to believe in whatever religion, but the primary religion was Christianity, and MOST OF THE MORALS FROM A CHRISTIAN CHURCH (as i said) were steps for writing out the constitution
reply 0
josiewdog123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Not at all, the Constitution writers did not base the document from Christian morals. John Locke was where Hamilton and others got their influence from, and some of the English constitution. Christianity was not added into the Constitution due to the First Amendment
reply 0
Eli22b 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Times have changed though, this isn't the 1700 and 1800's anymore. Things are bound to change, and changes like gay marriage are things people are just going to have to accept.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Oh yeah i know that, but when people use that as their arguement, it just makes me laugh so much, because its probably the one thing that wont get you anything if you said that
reply 0
Eli22b 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

But now a-days it will. There is seperation of church and state. The US is now a melting pot, as much as some people want to, we can't base our laws off of church morals anymore. It just won't work.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

hahaha actually it isn't... considering gay marriage was out of the question when the constitutuion was drawn up...
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, it is unconstitutional. Most reasons people want it banned is because it goes against their religion, but America is based on a land where you can practice your own religion freely, no matter what it is. Banning gay marriage because it is against your religion is forcing your religion onto someone else, which goes against the first amendment. As for those who say they don't like it because they think its disgusting, well that goes against freedom of expression. They have a right to respect themselves any way they wish
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

well i'm sure Transgenders and blacks weren't considered either....so why can they still get married?
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Ask Abraham Lincoln. He's the one who wrote out the legal rights for blacks
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

so why can't anyone write out rights for gays? And i was looking at your quotes, and are you for or against gay marriage?
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

To be honest, i don't really care. It's not really any of my business or fights. Anybody can write out rights for gays, just not many congressmen would be willing to take it up to D.C. Also, just like the rights for blacks, it tooks hundreds of years before anything was officially done. It might take a while for the rights for gays to happen.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, the ban of gay marriage is currently being looked over by the Supreme Court
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

i understand. i just don't think we should have a repeat of history. this should be handled completely differently than people going bizerk.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Our consititution is the basis of most constitutions over the world
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

well it's unconstitutional to ban gay marriage, soo...
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

hahaha actually it isn't... considering gay marriage was out of the question when the constitutuion was drawn up...
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, it is unconstitutional. Most reasons people want it banned is because it goes against their religion, but America is based on a land where you can practice your own religion freely, no matter what it is. Banning gay marriage because it is against your religion is forcing your religion onto someone else, which goes against the first amendment. As for those who say they don't like it because they think its disgusting, well that goes against freedom of expression. They have a right to respect themselves any way they wish
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

well i'm sure Transgenders and blacks weren't considered either....so why can they still get married?
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Ask Abraham Lincoln. He's the one who wrote out the legal rights for blacks
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

so why can't anyone write out rights for gays? And i was looking at your quotes, and are you for or against gay marriage?
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

To be honest, i don't really care. It's not really any of my business or fights. Anybody can write out rights for gays, just not many congressmen would be willing to take it up to D.C. Also, just like the rights for blacks, it tooks hundreds of years before anything was officially done. It might take a while for the rights for gays to happen.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, the ban of gay marriage is currently being looked over by the Supreme Court
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

i understand. i just don't think we should have a repeat of history. this should be handled completely differently than people going bizerk.
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Lol at everyone saying how her oppinion is wrong and she should stop expressing it. That's unconstituional and hypocritical. Freedom of speech is in the constitution, so she can say whatever the he/l she wants.
reply 0
jstallons 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

True that! lol
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

not everyone lives in the US..
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Our consititution is the basis of most constitutions over the world
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

well it's unconstitutional to ban gay marriage, soo...
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

hahaha actually it isn't... considering gay marriage was out of the question when the constitutuion was drawn up...
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, it is unconstitutional. Most reasons people want it banned is because it goes against their religion, but America is based on a land where you can practice your own religion freely, no matter what it is. Banning gay marriage because it is against your religion is forcing your religion onto someone else, which goes against the first amendment. As for those who say they don't like it because they think its disgusting, well that goes against freedom of expression. They have a right to respect themselves any way they wish
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

well i'm sure Transgenders and blacks weren't considered either....so why can they still get married?
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Ask Abraham Lincoln. He's the one who wrote out the legal rights for blacks
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

so why can't anyone write out rights for gays? And i was looking at your quotes, and are you for or against gay marriage?
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

To be honest, i don't really care. It's not really any of my business or fights. Anybody can write out rights for gays, just not many congressmen would be willing to take it up to D.C. Also, just like the rights for blacks, it tooks hundreds of years before anything was officially done. It might take a while for the rights for gays to happen.
reply 0
[deleted] 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Actually, the ban of gay marriage is currently being looked over by the Supreme Court
reply 0
kiaranine 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

i understand. i just don't think we should have a repeat of history. this should be handled completely differently than people going bizerk.
reply 0
thgcfmj123 1 decade ago on quote #6702987
show buttons

Thats true
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6643817
show buttons

My boyfriend tells me graphic things about my best guy friends jerking off, then they come up and say hi to me and on the sinde im just dying...
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6618983
show buttons

Hey I'm with you on this one. It still kind of sickens me with the what if's in pregnancies...
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6600379
show buttons

Yeah i totally had that for finals last week! If you get the breakthrough, it totally ends up making sense
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6581750
show buttons

Please update again! I feel lonely without your writing...
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6600379
show buttons

I think of cation (positive) as like witty, and we all like witty right? So cats are like a positive impact on my life. Then for anions (negatives) i think of onions because i hate onions! and so then its like a negative impact on my life
reply 0
AnotherAverageTeenageGirl 1 decade ago on quote #6600379
show buttons

haha thats awesome!! I'm so using that for the chapter test, but the test i have tomorrow is like knowning Hydronium is H3O+ and Ammonium is NH4+ lol
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6596437
show buttons

I actually thought of Djbouti Djbouti, Koalas, and Apples :)
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6583504
show buttons

Count Scratchy McMittens
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6567814
show buttons

He's amazing. He's funny, hes sarcastic, smart, strong (emotionally), hes a complete dork in every way :) He loves coffee, and cant sleep at night, he can make anyone feel beautiful while truly meaning the words, i can talk to him about anything in the whole world, without it being awkward, and its just... he makes me feel all fluttery :)
reply 0
heyworlditsme 1 decade ago on quote #6567814
show buttons

Aw he sounds perfect :) are you guys dating?
reply 0
softballlover123 1 decade ago on quote #6566138
show buttons

Lol im cheating on my boyfriend with you, my fridge, and my bed, guess it's going to be a five some!
reply 0